<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Energy Analysis &#187; Tax Incentives &amp; Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://energyanalysis.org/category/green-incentives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://energyanalysis.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:04:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EPA/NHTSA Finalize New Fuel Economy Standards for Light Duty Cars &amp; Trucks</title>
		<link>http://energyanalysis.org/2010/04/05/epanhtsa-finalize-new-fuel-economy-standards-for-light-duty-cars-trucks/</link>
		<comments>http://energyanalysis.org/2010/04/05/epanhtsa-finalize-new-fuel-economy-standards-for-light-duty-cars-trucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax Incentives & Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyanalysis.org/?p=1084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to EPA, mobile sources emitted 31 percent of all U.S. GHG emissions in 2007 and have been the fastest-growing source of U.S. GHG emissions since 1990. EPA’s Standards Example footprint targets for popular vehicle models are shown in Table 2.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to EPA, mobile sources emitted 31 percent of all U.S. GHG emissions in 2007  and have been the fastest-growing  source of U.S. GHG emissions since 1990.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/regulations/420f10014.htm#3"><strong>EPA’s  Standards</strong></a></p>
<p>Example footprint targets for popular vehicle models are shown in Table  2.</p>
<p><a href="http://energyanalysis.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/table-2-2016-light-duty-mpg4.bmp"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1090" title="2016 light duty mpg targets" src="http://energyanalysis.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/table-2-2016-light-duty-mpg4.bmp" alt="" width="489" height="233" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energyanalysis.org/2010/04/05/epanhtsa-finalize-new-fuel-economy-standards-for-light-duty-cars-trucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US House panel approves decoupling policy, grid upgrades</title>
		<link>http://energyanalysis.org/2009/01/25/us-house-panel-approves-decoupling-policy-grid-upgrades/</link>
		<comments>http://energyanalysis.org/2009/01/25/us-house-panel-approves-decoupling-policy-grid-upgrades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax Incentives & Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decoupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart grid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyanalysis.org/?p=959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washington (Platts) &#8212; The US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee, in a 34-17 vote along party lines, approved energy provisions in the $825-billion economic recovery package that include $11 billion in smart grid investments and policies to encourage states to adopt utility rate structures that ensure their cost recovery. Read More&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington (Platts) &#8212; The US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee, in a 34-17 vote along party lines, approved energy provisions in the $825-billion economic recovery package that include $11 billion in smart grid investments and policies to encourage states to adopt utility rate structures that ensure their cost recovery. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.platts.com/Electric%20Power/News/8306090.xml?src=rssheadlines0">Read More&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energyanalysis.org/2009/01/25/us-house-panel-approves-decoupling-policy-grid-upgrades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fuel consumption vs. miles per gallon</title>
		<link>http://energyanalysis.org/2009/01/19/fuel-consumption-vs-miles-per-gallon/</link>
		<comments>http://energyanalysis.org/2009/01/19/fuel-consumption-vs-miles-per-gallon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax Incentives & Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miles per gallon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyanalysis.org/?p=938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A jump from 14 to 16 mpg saves as much oil as a jump from 35 to 51 mpg, a NY Times editorial emphasized today. You may be tempted to do the math yourself just to prove it&#8230; The reasoning is illustrated in the graph below of annual fuel consumption based on 12,000 vehicle miles. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A jump from 14 to 16 mpg saves as much oil as a jump from 35 to 51 mpg, a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/19/opinion/19mon1.html">NY Times editorial</a> emphasized today. You may be tempted to do the math yourself just to prove it&#8230;</p>
<p>The reasoning is illustrated in the graph below of annual fuel consumption based on 12,000 vehicle miles. Fuel consumption is a non-linear function of miles per gallon, making it somewhat difficult to compare annual fuel costs of different vehicle types. Fuel consumption per mile or per 100 miles traveled, might be a better yardstick. But then again, this is not rocket science.</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-939 alignnone" title="Anual Fuel Consumption vs. MPG" src="http://energyanalysis.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/anual-fuel-consumption.jpg" alt="Anual Fuel Consumption vs. MPG" width="381" height="281" /></p>
<p><strong>Related Links</strong></p>
<p>hybridCARS.com: <a href="http://www.hybridcars.com/suvs-minivans/chrysler-aspen-hybrid.html">Chrysler Aspen Hybrid</a></p>
<p>NY Times: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/19/opinion/19mon1.html">Energy Inefficient</a></p>
<p>Energy Analysis: <a href="http://energyanalysis.org/2008/07/01/the-concept-of-fuel-economy-does-it-lead-to-good-decisions/">The Concept of Fuel Economy: Does it Lead to Good Decisions?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energyanalysis.org/2009/01/19/fuel-consumption-vs-miles-per-gallon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

